[20210219]全表扫描逻辑读问题.txt

来源:这里教程网 时间:2026-03-03 16:28:18 作者:

[20210219]全表扫描逻辑读问题.txt --//一般探究逻辑读设置_trace_pin_time,或者设置10200事件. --//设置_trace_pin_time有一个明显的缺点就是在系统级设置,而且要重启,这样每个进程产生大量跟踪信息. --//还有的一个因素就是对于唯一索引的执行计划,一些pin会捕捉到.自己没什么事情测试看看, --//主要出现一些小问题,自己无法理解. 1.环境: SYS@book> @ver1 PORT_STRING                    VERSION        BANNER ------------------------------ -------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64/Linux 2.4.xx            11.2.0.4.0     Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production SYS@book> alter system set "_trace_pin_time"=1 scope=spfile; System altered. --//重启数据库. SYS@book> @ hide _trace_pin NAME            DESCRIPTION                          DEFAULT_VALUE SESSION_VALUE SYSTEM_VALUE ISSES ISSYS_MOD --------------- ------------------------------------ ------------- ------------- ------------ ----- --------- _trace_pin_time trace how long a current pin is held FALSE         1             1            FALSE FALSE 2.测试: --//测试前在别的会话执行select * from emp;多次,避免一些递归语句的执行.不然跟踪输出太乱. SCOTT@book> @ 10046on 12 Session altered. SCOTT@book> select * from emp;      EMPNO ENAME      JOB              MGR HIREDATE                   SAL       COMM     DEPTNO ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------       7369 SMITH      CLERK           7902 1980-12-17 00:00:00        800                    20 ...       7934 MILLER     CLERK           7782 1982-01-23 00:00:00       1300                    10 14 rows selected. SCOTT@book> @ 10046off Session altered. 3.检查跟踪文件: ===================== PARSING IN CURSOR #139634694966072 len=17 dep=0 uid=83 oct=3 lid=83 tim=1613695908737267 hv=1745700775 ad='7c3dc5f0' sqlid='a2dk8bdn0ujx7' select * from emp END OF STMT PARSE #139634694966072:c=3000,e=2654,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=3956160932,tim=1613695908737263 EXEC #139634694966072:c=0,e=41,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=3956160932,tim=1613695908737408 WAIT #139634694966072: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=407 tim=1613695908737476 pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000092:4 time 3681186314 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000093:1 time 3681186358 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000094:1 time 3681186382 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000095:1 time 3681186398 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000096:1 time 3681186413 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000097:1 time 3681186429 FETCH #139634694966072:c=0,e=161,p=0,cr=6,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,plh=3956160932,tim=1613695908737681 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WAIT #139634694966072: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 557 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=407 tim=1613695908738283 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000097:1 time 3681187130 WAIT #139634694966072: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=407 tim=1613695908738391 FETCH #139634694966072:c=0,e=89,p=0,cr=1,cu=0,mis=0,r=13,dep=0,og=1,plh=3956160932,tim=1613695908738440 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ STAT #139634694966072 id=1 cnt=14 pid=0 pos=1 obj=87108 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL EMP (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=144 us cost=3 size=532 card=14)' *** 2021-02-19 08:51:51.614 WAIT #139634694966072: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 2876023 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=407 tim=1613695911614606 CLOSE #139634694966072:c=0,e=10,dep=0,type=0,tim=1613695911614709 ===================== PARSING IN CURSOR #139634694966072 len=55 dep=0 uid=83 oct=42 lid=83 tim=1613695911614965 hv=2217940283 ad='0' sqlid='06nvwn223659v' alter session set events '10046 trace name context off' END OF STMT PARSE #139634694966072:c=999,e=194,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=0,plh=0,tim=1613695911614964 EXEC #139634694966072:c=0,e=373,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=0,plh=0,tim=1613695911615415 $ grep ^pin /tmp/aa.txt pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000092:4 time 3681186314 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000093:1 time 3681186358 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000094:1 time 3681186382 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000095:1 time 3681186398 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000096:1 time 3681186413 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000097:1 time 3681186429 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000097:1 time 3681187130 --//0x1000092 = set dba 4,146 = alter system dump datafile 4 block 146 = 16777362 --//0x1000097 = set dba 4,151 = alter system dump datafile 4 block 151 = 16777367 --//0x1000097 读2次,注意看前面fetch存在2次,第1次fetch1条,第2次fetch 13次.共14条记录返回. --//中间4块是空块. SCOTT@book> alter session set statistics_level = all; Session altered. SCOTT@book> select * from emp; ... SCOTT@book> @ dpc '' '' PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------- SQL_ID  a2dk8bdn0ujx7, child number 2 ------------------------------------- select * from emp Plan hash value: 3956160932 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation         | Name | Starts | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| E-Time   | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |      1 |        |       |     3 (100)|          |     14 |00:00:00.01 |       7 | |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP  |      1 |     14 |   532 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |     14 |00:00:00.01 |       7 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id): -------------------------------------------------------------    1 - SEL$1 / EMP@SEL$1 --//与前面的测试逻辑读正好7个一致.有点奇怪的是与vaga书提到的不同,按照他的介绍段头要读2次.而实际上仅仅1次.这是我的疑问. SCOTT@book> select rowid from emp where rownum=1; ROWID ------------------ AAAVREAAEAAAACXAAA SCOTT@book> @ rowid AAAVREAAEAAAACXAAA     OBJECT       FILE      BLOCK        ROW ROWID_DBA            DBA                  TEXT ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------------------- -------------------- ----------------------------------------      87108          4        151          0  0x1000097           4,151                alter system dump datafile 4 block 151 ; SCOTT@book> select * from dba_segments where owner=user and segment_name='EMP'   2  @ prxx ============================== OWNER                         : SCOTT SEGMENT_NAME                  : EMP PARTITION_NAME                : SEGMENT_TYPE                  : TABLE SEGMENT_SUBTYPE               : ASSM TABLESPACE_NAME               : USERS HEADER_FILE                   : 4 HEADER_BLOCK                  : 146 BYTES                         : 65536 BLOCKS                        : 8 EXTENTS                       : 1 INITIAL_EXTENT                : 65536 NEXT_EXTENT                   : 1048576 MIN_EXTENTS                   : 1 MAX_EXTENTS                   : 2147483645 MAX_SIZE                      : 2147483645 RETENTION                     : MINRETENTION                  : PCT_INCREASE                  : FREELISTS                     : FREELIST_GROUPS               : RELATIVE_FNO                  : 4 BUFFER_POOL                   : DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE                   : DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE              : DEFAULT PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. --//段头dba=4,146.与跟踪看到的dba地址一致. 4.建立另外的表测试看看: SCOTT@book> create table empx as select * from emp; Table created. SCOTT@book> @ 10046on 12 Session altered. SCOTT@book> select /*+ full(empx) */ count(*) from empx;   COUNT(*) ----------         14 SCOTT@book> @ 10046off Session altered. ===================== PARSING IN CURSOR #139940786742280 len=43 dep=0 uid=83 oct=3 lid=83 tim=1613696616211174 hv=4266967087 ad='7e10b110' sqlid='36gz0zrz59h1g' select /*+ full(empx) */ count(*) from empx END OF STMT PARSE #139940786742280:c=1999,e=1151,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=1,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=36332186,tim=1613696616211169 EXEC #139940786742280:c=0,e=37,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=1,plh=36332186,tim=1613696616211315 WAIT #139940786742280: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 1 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1613696616211379 pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000222:4 time 93692910 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000223:1 time 93692951 FETCH #139940786742280:c=0,e=100,p=0,cr=2,cu=0,mis=0,r=1,dep=0,og=1,plh=36332186,tim=1613696616211516 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ STAT #139940786742280 id=1 cnt=1 pid=0 pos=1 obj=0 op='SORT AGGREGATE (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=97 us)' STAT #139940786742280 id=2 cnt=14 pid=1 pos=1 obj=90510 op='TABLE ACCESS FULL EMPX (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=79 us cost=3 size=0 card=14)' WAIT #139940786742280: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 332 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1613696616212000 FETCH #139940786742280:c=0,e=2,p=0,cr=0,cu=0,mis=0,r=0,dep=0,og=0,plh=36332186,tim=1613696616212063 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ WAIT #139940786742280: nam='SQL*Net message to client' ela= 2 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1613696616212101 *** 2021-02-19 09:03:39.314 WAIT #139940786742280: nam='SQL*Net message from client' ela= 3102263 driver id=1650815232 #bytes=1 p3=0 obj#=-1 tim=1613696619314389 CLOSE #139940786742280:c=0,e=10,dep=0,type=0,tim=1613696619314489 ===================== --//0x1000222 = set dba 4,546 = alter system dump datefile 4 block 546 = 16777762 SCOTT@book> @ dpc '' '' PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------- SQL_ID  36gz0zrz59h1g, child number 2 ------------------------------------- select /*+ full(empx) */ count(*) from empx Plan hash value: 36332186 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation          | Name | Starts | E-Rows | Cost (%CPU)| E-Time   | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |      1 |        |     3 (100)|          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       2 | |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |      1 |      1 |            |          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       2 | |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMPX |      1 |     14 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |     14 |00:00:00.01 |       2 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id): -------------------------------------------------------------    1 - SEL$1    2 - SEL$1 / EMPX@SEL$1 --//2个逻辑读.也就是不像vage测试那样,读段头2次在全表扫描的情况下.为什么呢? --//如果你看链接http://www.askmaclean.com/archives/%e5%86%8d%e8%ae%aeopen-cursor%e4%b8%8ebulk-collect.html的测试,可以发 --//现kteinpscan后跟着一个kteinmap.版本问题,还是oracle做了什么改进. pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x10a6202:4 time 1039048805 pin ktewh27: kteinmap dba 0x10a6202:4 time 1039048847 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5.我使用gdb跟踪进程,发现实际上还是调用kteinmap. SCOTT@book> select * from emp; (gdb) b kteinmap Breakpoint 1 at 0xfc97f0 (gdb) c Continuing. Breakpoint 1, 0x0000000000fc97f0 in kteinmap () (gdb) info register rax            0x0      0 rbx            0x0      0 rcx            0x0      0 rdx            0x0      0 rsi            0x85f7a080       2247598208 rdi            0x7f44073a92f0   139930155782896 rbp            0x7fff1225b300   0x7fff1225b300 rsp            0x7fff1225b300   0x7fff1225b300 r8             0x85f7a080       2247598208 r9             0x0      0 r10            0x85f7a020       2247598112 r11            0x10     16 r12            0x7f44073a92f0   139930155782896 r13            0x7f44073a95c0   139930155783616 r14            0x0      0 r15            0x0      0 rip            0xfc97f0 0xfc97f0 <kteinmap+4> eflags         0x246    [ PF ZF IF ] cs             0x33     51 ss             0x2b     43 ds             0x0      0 es             0x0      0 fs             0x0      0 gs             0x0      0 fctrl          0x27f    639 fstat          0x4020   16416 ftag           0xffff   65535 fiseg          0x0      0 fioff          0x5f47add        99908317 foseg          0x7fff   32767 fooff          0x1225bb28       304462632 fop            0x0      0 mxcsr          0x1fa0   [ PE IM DM ZM OM UM PM ] (gdb) x /32x $rdi 0x7f44073a92f0: 0x00000004      0x01000092      0x00015444      0x00015444 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0x7f44073a9300: 0x003f0008      0x00001fe8      0x00000000      0x00000000 0x7f44073a9310: 0x00000000      0x00000000      0x00000000      0x00000000 0x7f44073a9320: 0x0000000a      0x00000000      0x0747b6d0      0x00007f44 0x7f44073a9330: 0x0747b690      0x00007f44      0x00000000      0x00000000 0x7f44073a9340: 0x00000000      0x00000000      0x00000000      0x00000000 0x7f44073a9350: 0x00000033      0x01000092      0x00000004      0x00000004 0x7f44073a9360: 0x01000093      0x00000005      0x01000090      0x00000008 --//$rdi记录的地址偏移4个字节记录的是dba地址. 我尝试建立大表发现还是可以跟踪到kteinmap.继续... 6.继续测试: SCOTT@book> create table t1 as select * from dba_objects where rownum<=600; Table created. SCOTT@book> select count(*),DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(rowid) from t1 group by DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(rowid) order by 2;   COUNT(*) DBMS_ROWID.ROWID_BLOCK_NUMBER(ROWID) ---------- ------------------------------------         88                                 3483         83                                 3484         80                                 3485         78                                 3486         78                                 3487         80                                 3488         81                                 3489         32                                 3490 8 rows selected. --//88+83+80+78+78 = 407,这样仅仅使用1个extent. SCOTT@book> create table t2 as select * from dba_objects where rownum<=407; Table created. SCOTT@book> create table t3 as select * from dba_objects where rownum<=408; Table created. --//分析表略. > select count(*) from t2; Plan hash value: 3321871023 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation          | Name | Starts | E-Rows | Cost (%CPU)| E-Time   | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |      1 |        |     4 (100)|          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       6 | |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |      1 |      1 |            |          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       6 | |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T2   |      1 |    407 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |    407 |00:00:00.01 |       6 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** 2021-02-19 16:03:37.760 pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000daa:4 time 3820405730 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000dab:1 time 3820405818 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000dac:1 time 3820405880 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000dad:1 time 3820405919 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000dae:1 time 3820405953 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000daf:1 time 3820405988 SCOTT@book> select count(*) from t3; Plan hash value: 463314188 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation          | Name | Starts | E-Rows | Cost (%CPU)| E-Time   | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |      1 |        |     4 (100)|          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       8 | |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |      1 |      1 |            |          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       8 | |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T3   |      1 |    408 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |    408 |00:00:00.01 |       8 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** 2021-02-19 16:05:05.952 pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000db2:4 time 3908597185 pin ktewh27: kteinmap dba 0x1000db2:4 time 3908597257 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000db3:1 time 3908597290 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000db4:1 time 3908597334 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000db5:1 time 3908597372 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000db6:1 time 3908597412 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000db7:1 time 3908597456 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000db8:1 time 3908597505 --//你可以发现我仅仅增加1条记录,逻辑读增加2个. --//0x1000db2 = set dba 4,3506 = alter system dump datafile 4 block 3506 = 16780722 SCOTT@book> alter system dump datafile 4 block 3506; System altered. Block dump from disk: buffer tsn: 4 rdba: 0x01000db2 (4/3506) scn: 0x0003.176c4279 seq: 0x01 flg: 0x04 tail: 0x42792301 frmt: 0x02 chkval: 0xd1dd type: 0x23=PAGETABLE SEGMENT HEADER Hex dump of block: st=0, typ_found=1 Dump of memory from 0x00007F7083993200 to 0x00007F7083995200 7F7083993200 0000A223 01000DB2 176C4279 04010003  [#.......yBl.....] 7F7083993210 0000D1DD 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................] 7F7083993220 00000000 00000002 00000010 00000A9C  [................] 7F7083993230 00000001 00000001 00000008 01000DB9  [................] 7F7083993240 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000009  [................] 7F7083993250 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001  [................] 7F7083993260 00000001 00000008 01000DB9 00000000  [................] 7F7083993270 00000001 00000000 00000009 01000DB0  [................] 7F7083993280 01000DB0 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................] 7F7083993290 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]         Repeat 3 times 7F70839932D0 00000001 00002000 00000000 00001434  [..... ......4...] 7F70839932E0 00000000 01000DB1 00000001 01000DB0  [................] 7F70839932F0 01000DB1 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................] 7F7083993300 00000000 00000000 00000002 00000000  [................] 7F7083993310 00016198 10000000 01000DB0 00000008  [.a..............] 7F7083993320 01000DB8 00000008 00000000 00000000  [................] 7F7083993330 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]         Repeat 151 times 7F7083993CB0 01000DB0 01000DB3 01000DB0 01000DB8  [................] 7F7083993CC0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]         Repeat 151 times 7F7083994640 00000000 00000000 01000DB1 00000000  [................] 7F7083994650 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000  [................]         Repeat 185 times 7F70839951F0 00000000 00000000 00000000 42792301  [.............#yB]   Extent Control Header   -----------------------------------------------------------------   Extent Header:: spare1: 0      spare2: 0      #extents: 2      #blocks: 16                   last map  0x00000000  #maps: 0      offset: 2716       Highwater::  0x01000db9  ext#: 1      blk#: 1      ext size: 8       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~高水位标识.   #blocks in seg. hdr's freelists: 0   #blocks below: 9   mapblk  0x00000000  offset: 1                    Unlocked   --------------------------------------------------------   Low HighWater Mark :       Highwater::  0x01000db9  ext#: 1      blk#: 1      ext size: 8   #blocks in seg. hdr's freelists: 0   #blocks below: 9   mapblk  0x00000000  offset: 1   Level 1 BMB for High HWM block: 0x01000db0   Level 1 BMB for Low HWM block: 0x01000db0   --------------------------------------------------------   Segment Type: 1 nl2: 1      blksz: 8192   fbsz: 0   L2 Array start offset:  0x00001434   First Level 3 BMB:  0x00000000   L2 Hint for inserts:  0x01000db1   Last Level 1 BMB:  0x01000db0   Last Level II BMB:  0x01000db1   Last Level III BMB:  0x00000000      Map Header:: next  0x00000000  #extents: 2    obj#: 90520  flag: 0x10000000   Inc # 0   Extent Map   -----------------------------------------------------------------    0x01000db0  length: 8    0x01000db8  length: 8   Auxillary Map   --------------------------------------------------------    Extent 0     :  L1 dba:  0x01000db0 Data dba:  0x01000db3    Extent 1     :  L1 dba:  0x01000db0 Data dba:  0x01000db8   --------------------------------------------------------    Second Level Bitmap block DBAs    --------------------------------------------------------    DBA 1:   0x01000db1 End dump data blocks tsn: 4 file#: 4 minblk 3506 maxblk 3506 --//存在2个extent. --//你可以发现在Auxillary Map仅仅1条Extent的情况下就不会将kteinmap计入逻辑读的现象. 7.继续测试调用kteinmap的情况: create table t1 as select * from dba_objects ; --//分析略.不然逻辑读有一些增加. SCOTT@book> alter session set "_serial_direct_read"=never; Session altered. --//注:主要我的表有点大,出现直接路径读,需要关闭直接路径读.不然仅仅看到仅仅2个逻辑读. *** 2021-02-19 16:16:43.303 pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000d9a:4 time 310980860 pin ktewh27: kteinmap dba 0x1000d9a:4 time 310980967 SCOTT@book> select count(*) from t1;   COUNT(*) ----------      87003 $ grep -C1 kteinmap /tmp/a1.txt pin ktewh26: kteinpscan dba 0x1000d9a:4 time 436002887 pin ktewh27: kteinmap dba 0x1000d9a:4 time 436002967 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000d9b:1 time 436003159 -- pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000dff:1 time 436006353 pin ktewh27: kteinmap dba 0x1000d9a:4 time 436006383 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000781:1 time 436006478 -- pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000a7f:1 time 436028085 pin ktewh27: kteinmap dba 0x1000d9a:4 time 436028114 pin kdswh11: kdst_fetch dba 0x1000a82:1 time 436029189 --//出现3次. --//0x1000d9a = set dba 4,3482 = alter system dump datafile 4 block 3482 = 16780698; $ grep "^pin" /tmp/a1.txt |wc    1246    8722   68524 Plan hash value: 3724264953 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation          | Name | Starts | E-Rows | Cost (%CPU)| E-Time   | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |      1 |        |   347 (100)|          |      1 |00:00:00.04 |    1246 | |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |      1 |      1 |            |          |      1 |00:00:00.04 |    1246 | |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1   |      1 |  87003 |   347   (1)| 00:00:05 |  87003 |00:00:00.03 |    1246 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------    --//逻辑读的数量1246一致. SCOTT@book> alter system checkpoint; System altered. SCOTT@book> alter system dump datafile 4 block 3482; System altered. --//转储  Auxillary Map部分如下:   Auxillary Map   --------------------------------------------------------    Extent 0     :  L1 dba:  0x01000d98 Data dba:  0x01000d9b    Extent 1     :  L1 dba:  0x01000d98 Data dba:  0x01000da0    Extent 2     :  L1 dba:  0x01000dc0 Data dba:  0x01000dc1    Extent 3     :  L1 dba:  0x01000dc0 Data dba:  0x01000dc8    Extent 4     :  L1 dba:  0x01000dd0 Data dba:  0x01000dd1    Extent 5     :  L1 dba:  0x01000dd0 Data dba:  0x01000dd8    Extent 6     :  L1 dba:  0x01000de0 Data dba:  0x01000de1    Extent 7     :  L1 dba:  0x01000de0 Data dba:  0x01000de8    Extent 8     :  L1 dba:  0x01000df0 Data dba:  0x01000df1    Extent 9     :  L1 dba:  0x01000df0 Data dba:  0x01000df8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=>读到0x1000dff后出现kteinmap.    Extent 10    :  L1 dba:  0x01000780 Data dba:  0x01000781    Extent 11    :  L1 dba:  0x01000780 Data dba:  0x01000788    Extent 12    :  L1 dba:  0x01000790 Data dba:  0x01000791    Extent 13    :  L1 dba:  0x01000790 Data dba:  0x01000798    Extent 14    :  L1 dba:  0x010007a0 Data dba:  0x010007a1    Extent 15    :  L1 dba:  0x010007a0 Data dba:  0x010007a8    Extent 16    :  L1 dba:  0x01000800 Data dba:  0x01000802    Extent 17    :  L1 dba:  0x01000880 Data dba:  0x01000882    Extent 18    :  L1 dba:  0x01000900 Data dba:  0x01000902    Extent 19    :  L1 dba:  0x01000a00 Data dba:  0x01000a02 -------------------------------------------------=>读到0x1000a7f后出现kteinmap.    Extent 20    :  L1 dba:  0x01000a80 Data dba:  0x01000a82    Extent 21    :  L1 dba:  0x01000b00 Data dba:  0x01000b02    Extent 22    :  L1 dba:  0x01000b80 Data dba:  0x01000b82    Extent 23    :  L1 dba:  0x01000c00 Data dba:  0x01000c02    Extent 24    :  L1 dba:  0x01000c80 Data dba:  0x01000c82   -------------------------------------------------------- --//你可以简单发现一个规律,1次调用kteinmap读10个Extent. 总结: 1.当段头的 Auxillary Map仅仅1个Extent时,全表扫描不会将出现kteinmap计入逻辑读的情况. 2.如果段头的 Auxillary Map 记录的extent很多,每次调用kteinmap读10个Extent. 3.我没有测试索引全扫描以及索引快速全扫描的情况,有机会测试看看. 4.注意执行计划存在INDEX UNIQUE SCAN,是检测不到pin的情况的.

相关推荐