[20221128]再谈防水墙(视图访问性能问题).txt

来源:这里教程网 时间:2026-03-03 18:11:14 作者:

[20221128]再谈防水墙(视图访问性能问题).txt 1.环境: SYS> @ ver1 PORT_STRING                    VERSION        BANNER ------------------------------ -------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64/Linux 2.4.xx            11.2.0.4.0     Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.4.0 - 64bit Production 2.问题分析: --//上个星期看了生产系统awr报表,发现一些问题.原来防水墙不断调用执行如下: begin :con := "TASSETACL"."QUERYACL"(:sn, :on); end; --//该语句已经消失,我问了同事,据说升级过该产品,当时awr的记录如下: SQL ordered by Executions     %CPU - CPU Time as a percentage of Elapsed Time     %IO - User I/O Time as a percentage of Elapsed Time     Total Executions: 23,199,582     Captured SQL account for 34.2% of Total Executions      Rows Processed  Rows per Exec   Elapsed Time (s)%CPU    %IO   SQL Id          SQL Module      SQL Text 6,522,522       6,521,177       1.00            1,660.15        99.4    0     190q1sz3ywrd7   xxxxxx.eee      begin :con := "TASSETACL".QUE... 2,228,287       2,228,115       1.00            107.98          99.5    0     g7ytdh9mxt1s0   xxxxxx.eee      select count ( :"SYS_B_0" ) fr... --//而现在变成了如下: SQL ordered by Elapsed Time     Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL statements called by the code.     为PL/SQL代码报告的资源包括该代码调用的所有SQL语句所使用的资源。     % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100     %Total - Elapsed Time as a percentage of Total DB time     %CPU - CPU Time as a percentage of Elapsed Time     %IO - User I/O Time as a percentage of Elapsed Time     Captured SQL account for 65.1% of Total DB Time (s): 33,342     Captured PL/SQL account for 41.7% of Total DB Time (s): 33,342 Elapsed Time (s)  Executions   Elapsed Time per Exec (s)  %Total  %CPU   %IO  SQL Id         SQL Module                                 SQL Text 5,156.39          33,682       0.15                       15.47   98.35  0.01 3pw59r6rkw9gb  oraagent.bin@dm01dbadm01.XXX.com (TNS V1-  declare PRIVS_ERROR exception;... 5,153.22          33,683       0.15                       15.46   98.34  0.01 0xwxau19hznj8  oraagent.bin@dm01dbadm01.XXX.com (TNS V1-  begin dbagent.try_login(); end... 5,089.67          134,713      0.04                       15.26   98.34  0.00 8vmu6k690g87k  oraagent.bin@dm01dbadm01.XXX.com (TNS V1-  SELECT UPPER(NVL(PROGRAM, 'nul... --//原来的问题消失了,但是消耗的时间却增加了,很明显对方的产品没有经过严格的测试,就给用户使用了. --//取出sql语句,主要便于查看并且格式化如下: SYS> @ sql_id 3pw59r6rkw9gb --SQL_ID = 3pw59r6rkw9gb declare   PRIVS_ERROR exception; --raise error,if rule exception,will trigger privs_error   pragma exception_init(PRIVS_ERROR, -1031); begin   execute immediate 'begin dbagent.try_login(); end;'; exception   when PRIVS_ERROR then     raise;   when others then     rollback; end dbagent_logon;; --//注意后面多了1个分号,是我写的脚本无法区分PL/SQL语句与sql语句造成的问题. SYS> @sql_id 0xwxau19hznj8 --SQL_ID = 0xwxau19hznj8 begin dbagent.try_login(); end;; SYS> @ sql_id 8vmu6k690g87k --SQL_ID = 8vmu6k690g87k SELECT UPPER (NVL (PROGRAM, 'null'))       ,UPPER (MODULE)       ,TYPE       ,DECODE        (           NVL (INSTR (PROCESS, ':'), 0)          ,0, NVL (PROCESS, 1234)          ,SUBSTR (PROCESS, 1, INSTR (PROCESS, ':') - 1)        )       ,OSUSER       ,MACHINE       ,SCHEMANAME       ,USERNAME       ,SERVICE_NAME       ,SID       ,SERIAL#   FROM SYS.V_$SESSION  WHERE SID = SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'sid'); --//134713/33682 = 3.99955.平均执行3pw59r6rkw9gb1次,执行8vmu6k690g87k 4次. --//可以看出调用顺序3pw59r6rkw9gb,0xwxau19hznj8,8vmu6k690g87k 分别执行次数的比例是1:1:4. --//很明显开发没有写好程序代码.仅仅需要调用1次8vmu6k690g87k就ok了. --//如果修改代码可以提高效率4倍. 仅仅需要5156/4 = 1289秒.但是我的问题并不再这里,细节很重要,为什么8vmu6k690g87k的执行有点 --//慢.再仔细看sql_id='8vmu6k690g87k'每次执行需要0.04秒=40ms(估计存在四舍五入问题,因为0.04*4=0.16),有点慢,因为where条件 --//查询使用sid,不应该存在这么"慢"的情况. --//开始以为都是Module=oraagent.bin执行的,后面我发现实际上几乎全部模块都存在相似调用,看代码可以猜出是登陆数据库时触发器 --//调用执行的代码.这时我突然想起我自己写的登陆触发器用于设置cursor_sharing=force也存在类似的调用v$session视图的情况,很 --//明显我写的代码调用次数应该也有33XXX次数.Elapsed Time至少应该 5089/4 = 1272秒,但是并没有出现在awr报表中.另外我想到是 --//否因为select部分消耗cpu资源太多,我马上否定我的猜测,因为仅仅返回1行,无论如何不应该这么"慢". --//当我看我写的触发器代码马上明白问题在那里.我是分开写的,可以参考链接 --// http://blog.itpub.net/267265/viewspace-2768591/ => [20210418]查询v$视图问题.txt --// connor-mcdonald.com/2021/04/12/better-performance-when-querying-the-v-views 3.继续: $ cat a.txt SELECT UPPER (NVL (PROGRAM, 'null'))       ,UPPER (MODULE)       ,TYPE       ,DECODE        (           NVL (INSTR (PROCESS, ':'), 0)          ,0, NVL (PROCESS, 1234)          ,SUBSTR (PROCESS, 1, INSTR (PROCESS, ':') - 1)        )       ,OSUSER       ,MACHINE       ,SCHEMANAME       ,USERNAME       ,SERVICE_NAME       ,SID       ,SERIAL#   FROM SYS.V_$SESSION  WHERE SID = SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'sid'); --//查看起对应的执行计划: SYS> @ sl all alter session set statistics_level = all; Session altered. SYS> @ a.txt SYS> @ dpc '' '' '' PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT --------------------------- Plan hash value: 2422122865 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation                 | Name            | Starts | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| A-Rows |   A-Time   |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT          |                 |      1 |        |       |     1 (100)|      1 |00:00:00.02 |       |       |          | |   1 |  MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN     |                 |      1 |      1 |    62 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.02 |       |       |          | |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS            |                 |      1 |      1 |    12 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |*  3 |    FIXED TABLE FULL       | X$KSLWT         |      1 |      1 |     8 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |*  4 |    FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX| X$KSLED (ind:2) |      1 |      1 |     4 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |   5 |   BUFFER SORT             |                 |      1 |      1 |    50 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.02 |  2048 |  2048 | 2048  (0)| |*  6 |    FIXED TABLE FULL       | X$KSUSE         |      1 |      1 |    50 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.02 |       |       |          | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id): -------------------------------------------------------------    1 - SEL$88122447    3 - SEL$88122447 / W@SEL$4    4 - SEL$88122447 / E@SEL$4    6 - SEL$88122447 / S@SEL$4 Predicate Information (identified by operation id): ---------------------------------------------------    3 - filter("W"."KSLWTSID"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','sid')))    4 - filter("W"."KSLWTEVT"="E"."INDX")    6 - filter((BITAND("S"."KSSPAFLG",1)<>0 AND BITAND("S"."KSUSEFLG",1)<>0 AND "S"."INDX"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','sid'))               AND "S"."INST_ID"=USERENV('INSTANCE'))) --//你可以发现ID=3,全表扫描X$KSLWT,而过滤条件是 filter("W"."KSLWTSID"=TO_NUMBER(SYS_CONTEXT('userenv','sid'))),也就是无法把 --//SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'sid')当作常量处理. --//而生产库X$KSLWT 记录的数量不是一般测试环境的数量.我的测试环境仅仅返回24条.而生产系统返回很多. SYS> select count(*) from X$KSLWT;   COUNT(*) ----------       8793 --//访问X$KSUSE也是出现类似的情况. --//解决很简单,分开写: --// Get user SID information SELECT SYS_CONTEXT('userenv', 'sid')   INTO v_sid  FROM dual; --// Get Program executable,OSUSER Details,Machine Details for this session SELECT UPPER(NVL(PROGRAM, 'NULL')),        UPPER(MODULE),        DECODE(NVL(INSTR(PROCESS, ':'), 0), 0, NVL(PROCESS, 1234), SUBSTR(PROCESS, 1, INSTR(PROCESS, ':') - 1))        TYPE, OSUSER, MACHINE, SCHEMANAME, USERNAME, SERVICE_NAME, SID, SERIAL#   FROM SYS.V_$SESSION   where sid = v_sid; SYS> SELECT SYS_CONTEXT('userenv', 'sid')    FROM dual; SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV','SID') ---------------------------- 17017 $ cat a.txt SELECT UPPER (NVL (PROGRAM, 'null'))       ,UPPER (MODULE)       ,TYPE       ,DECODE        (           NVL (INSTR (PROCESS, ':'), 0)          ,0, NVL (PROCESS, 1234)          ,SUBSTR (PROCESS, 1, INSTR (PROCESS, ':') - 1)        )       ,OSUSER       ,MACHINE       ,SCHEMANAME       ,USERNAME       ,SERVICE_NAME       ,SID       ,SERIAL#   FROM SYS.V_$SESSION  WHERE SID= 17017 --SID = SYS_CONTEXT ('userenv', 'sid') ; SYS> @a.txt .. SYS> @ dpc '' '' '' PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT ------------------------------------- SQL_ID  gxdr0gq6nyums, child number 0 ------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 589956979 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation                  | Name            | Starts | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| A-Rows |   A-Time   |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT           |                 |      1 |        |       |     1 (100)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |   1 |  NESTED LOOPS              |                 |      1 |      1 |    62 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |   2 |   MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN     |                 |      1 |      1 |    58 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |*  3 |    FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX | X$KSUSE (ind:1) |      1 |      1 |    50 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |   4 |    BUFFER SORT             |                 |      1 |      1 |     8 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |  2048 |  2048 | 2048  (0)| |*  5 |     FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX| X$KSLWT (ind:1) |      1 |      1 |     8 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | |*  6 |   FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX  | X$KSLED (ind:2) |      1 |      1 |     4 |     0   (0)|      1 |00:00:00.01 |       |       |          | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id): -------------------------------------------------------------    1 - SEL$88122447    3 - SEL$88122447 / S@SEL$4    5 - SEL$88122447 / W@SEL$4    6 - SEL$88122447 / E@SEL$4 Predicate Information (identified by operation id): ---------------------------------------------------    3 - filter(("S"."INDX"=17017 AND BITAND("S"."KSSPAFLG",1)<>0 AND BITAND("S"."KSUSEFLG",1)<>0 AND               "S"."INST_ID"=USERENV('INSTANCE')))    5 - filter("W"."KSLWTSID"=17017)    6 - filter("W"."KSLWTEVT"="E"."INDX") --//connor-mcdonald.com 链接给出了另外的写法,使用with+materialize提示: $ cat b.txt with mysid as ( select /*+ materialize */ userenv('SID') n from dual ) SELECT UPPER(NVL(PROGRAM, 'NULL')),        UPPER(MODULE),        DECODE(NVL(INSTR(PROCESS, ':'), 0), 0, NVL(PROCESS, 1234), SUBSTR(PROCESS, 1, INSTR(PROCESS, ':') - 1))        TYPE, OSUSER, MACHINE, SCHEMANAME, USERNAME, SERVICE_NAME, SID, SERIAL#   FROM SYS.V_$SESSION,mysid  WHERE SID = mysid.n; SYS> @ b.txt .. Plan hash value: 2230424401 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id  | Operation                      | Name                        | Starts | E-Rows |E-Bytes| Cost (%CPU)| E-Time   | A-Rows |   A-Time   | Buffers | Reads  | Writes |  OMem |  1Mem | Used-Mem | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT               |                             |      1 |        |       |     4 (100)|          |      1 |00:00:00.03 |      15 |      1 |      1 |       |       |          | |   1 |  TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION     |                             |      1 |        |       |            |          |      1 |00:00:00.03 |      15 |      1 |      1 |       |       |          | |   2 |   LOAD AS SELECT               |                             |      1 |        |       |            |          |      0 |00:00:00.02 |       4 |      0 |      1 |   270K|   270K|  270K (0)| |   3 |    FAST DUAL                   |                             |      1 |      1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          | |   4 |   NESTED LOOPS                 |                             |      1 |      1 |    75 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |      1 |      0 |       |       |          | |   5 |    NESTED LOOPS                |                             |      1 |      1 |    71 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |      1 |      0 |       |       |          | |   6 |     NESTED LOOPS               |                             |      1 |      1 |    63 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |      1 |      0 |       |       |          | |   7 |      VIEW                      |                             |      1 |      1 |    13 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |      1 |      0 |       |       |          | |   8 |       TABLE ACCESS STORAGE FULL| SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6D71_CF54F429 |      1 |      1 |    13 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       5 |      1 |      0 |  1025K|  1025K|          | |*  9 |      FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX   | X$KSUSE (ind:1)             |      1 |      1 |    50 |     0   (0)|          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          | |* 10 |     FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX    | X$KSLWT (ind:1)             |      1 |      1 |     8 |     0   (0)|          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          | |* 11 |    FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX     | X$KSLED (ind:2)             |      1 |      1 |     4 |     0   (0)|          |      1 |00:00:00.01 |       0 |      0 |      0 |       |       |          | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id): -------------------------------------------------------------    1 - SEL$71D7A081    2 - SEL$1    3 - SEL$1        / DUAL@SEL$1    7 - SEL$D67CB2D2 / MYSID@SEL$2    8 - SEL$D67CB2D2 / T1@SEL$D67CB2D2    9 - SEL$71D7A081 / S@SEL$5   10 - SEL$71D7A081 / W@SEL$5   11 - SEL$71D7A081 / E@SEL$5 Predicate Information (identified by operation id): ---------------------------------------------------    9 - filter((BITAND("S"."KSSPAFLG",1)<>0 AND BITAND("S"."KSUSEFLG",1)<>0 AND "S"."INST_ID"=USERENV('INSTANCE') AND "S"."INDX"="MYSID"."N"))   10 - filter("S"."INDX"="W"."KSLWTSID")   11 - filter("W"."KSLWTEVT"="E"."INDX") 4.性能对比: --//我在toad下测试,多次执行观察 --//调用b.txt 大约需要2Xms. --//调用a.txt 大约需要5Xms. --//有时候两者差异不大,感觉这样比较不行,没有考虑网络的往返.另外写一篇测试该语句性能的blog. --//注:我后面测试with+materialize要产生redo日志,不建议在生产系统应用这样的写法,主要原因是执行频率太高了,累积起来redo很大!! 5.为什么调用1次0xwxau19hznj8,执行4次8vmu6k690g87k. --//我看了一下源代码,源代码这次没有加密. --//通过过程collect_app_info调用sql_id=8vmu6k690g87k --//而try_login代码通过4个函数分别取得对应值 --get login app name function get_app_name return varchar2 is begin   collect_app_info;   return l_appname; end; --get login app module name function get_app_module_name return varchar2 is begin   collect_app_info;   return l_module; end; --get login app type function get_app_type return varchar2 is begin   collect_app_info;   return l_type; end; --get app process number function get_app_process return number is begin   collect_app_info;   return l_process; end; --//这样就很好解析为什么调用1次执行4次sql_id=8vmu6k690g87k.而实际上   procedure collect_app_info is   begin     if not app_info_collect_status then       select upper(nvl(program, 'null')),              upper(module),              type,              decode(nvl(instr(process, ':'), 0),                     0,                     nvl(process, 1234),                     substr(process, 1, instr(process, ':') - 1)),              osuser,              machine,              SCHEMANAME,              USERNAME,              SERVICE_NAME,              sid,              serial#         into l_appname,              l_module,              l_type,              l_process,              l_osuser,              l_machine,              l_SCHEMANAME,              l_username,              l_service_name,              l_sid,              l_serial#         from sys.v_$session        where sid = sys_context('userenv', 'sid');     end if;   end; --//已经赋值给对应变量,根本不需要再通过什么函数返回对应值.直接使用对应变量应该可以,当然我没有测试. --//最简单修改:   procedure collect_app_info is   begin     if not app_info_collect_status then       select userenv('SID') into l_sid from dual;       select upper(nvl(program, 'null')),              upper(module),              type,              decode(nvl(instr(process, ':'), 0),                     0,                     nvl(process, 1234),                     substr(process, 1, instr(process, ':') - 1)),              osuser,              machine,              SCHEMANAME,              USERNAME,              SERVICE_NAME,              sid,              serial#         into l_appname,              l_module,              l_type,              l_process,              l_osuser,              l_machine,              l_SCHEMANAME,              l_username,              l_service_name,              l_sid,              l_serial#         from sys.v_$session        where sid = l_sid;     end if;   end; --//我的感觉可能分开写效率更高!!因为使用with+materialize会生成一个临时表,会产生日志,我还给测试看看. 6.总结: --//很明显对方缺乏蛮力测试就把产品做了升级,我曾经对乙方工程师讲过类似的问题,尽量不要让客户先于你发现产品的问题,这样是很 --//丢脸的事情.你内部测试怎么犯错都可以,客户是看不见的,一旦你犯错,对方先发现,对方会........ --//实际上只要大量用户连接数据库,该语句的问题才明显的暴露出来.

相关推荐