[20250204]21c library cache mutex的深入探究7(_mutex_wait_scheme=2).txt --//探究library cache mutex阻塞导致的相关等待事件,分析_mutex_wait_scheme=2的情况的相关细节。 1.环境: SYS@book> @ver2 ============================== PORT_STRING : x86_64/Linux 2.4.xx VERSION : 21.0.0.0.0 BANNER : Oracle Database 21c Enterprise Edition Release 21.0.0.0.0 - Production BANNER_FULL : Oracle Database 21c Enterprise Edition Release 21.0.0.0.0 - Production Version 21.3.0.0.0 BANNER_LEGACY : Oracle Database 21c Enterprise Edition Release 21.0.0.0.0 - Production CON_ID : 0 PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SYS@book> @ hidez ^_mutex NUM N_HEX NAME DESCRIPTION DEFAULT_VALUE SESSION_VALUE SYSTEM_VALUE ISSES ISSYS_MOD ---- ----- ------------------ ----------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ----- --------- 3553 DE1 _mutex_wait_time Mutex wait time TRUE 1 1 FALSE IMMEDIATE 3554 DE2 _mutex_spin_count Mutex spin count TRUE 255 255 FALSE IMMEDIATE 3555 DE3 _mutex_wait_scheme Mutex wait scheme TRUE 2 2 FALSE IMMEDIATE --//缺省_mutex_wait_time=1,时间单位与_mutex_wait_scheme相关,_mutex_wait_scheme=2时时间单位是厘秒,而 --//_mutex_wait_scheme=0,1时,单位时毫秒。 --//_mutex_wait_scheme =2时,_mutex_wait_time>1时sleeps的时间会出现指数回退. --//缺省_mutex_wait_scheme =2. --//网上找了一段资料: * _mutex_spin_count (Integer) - This sets the number of times to spin before yielding/waiting. * _mutex_wait_scheme (Integer) - In 11.2 this controls which wait scheme to use. It can be set to one of the three wait schemes described above thus: _mutex_wait_scheme = 0 – Always YIELD _mutex_wait_scheme = 1 & _mutex_wait_time = t – Always SLEEP for t milli-seconds _mutex_wait_scheme = 2 & _mutex_wait_time = t – EXP BACKOFF with maximum sleep (default) 2.测试前准备: SYS@book> oradebug setmypid Statement processed. SYS@book> oradebug dump library_cache 4 Statement processed. $ grep "^Bucket:" /u01/app/oracle/diag/rdbms/book/book/trace/book_ora_10770.trc | head -4 Bucket: #=0 Mutex=0x6cfa1400(1125281431552, 9, 0, 6) Bucket: #=5 Mutex=0x6cfa14f0(1125281431552, 4, 0, 6) Bucket: #=17 Mutex=0x6cfa1730(1125281431552, 8, 0, 6) Bucket: #=39 Mutex=0x6cfa1b50(1125281431552, 4, 0, 6) --//以上是前面测试的结果,直接找Bucket: #=0 Mutex=0x6cfa1400的语句测试。 --//该sql语句select /*+ 9 */ count(*) from dept where deptno = 93834;的bucket=0. --//Bucket: #=0 Mutex=0x6cfa1400 --//0x6cfa1400-0x10 = 0x6cfa13f0 3.测试: --//session 2: SYS@book> @opeek 0x6cfa13f0 48 0 [06CFA13F0, 06CFA1420) = 6CFA13F0 00000000 6CFA13F0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 --//前面2个8字节等于0x6cfa13f0,说明没有对象使用该library cache mutex。 --//session 1: SCOTT@book01p> @ spid ============================== SID : 281 SERIAL# : 36437 PROCESS : 3397 SERVER : DEDICATED SPID : 3399 PID : 42 P_SERIAL# : 5 KILL_COMMAND : alter system kill session '281,36437' immediate; PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. SCOTT@book01p> alter session set session_cached_cursors=0 ; Session altered. --//主要目的避免光标缓存,保证每次执行library cache mutex gets增加。 SCOTT@book01p> select /*+ 9 */ count(*) from dept where deptno = 93834; COUNT(*) ---------- 0 --//执行多次。 SCOTT@book01p> @ hash HASH_VALUE SQL_ID CHILD_NUMBER KGL_BUCKET PLAN_HASH_VALUE HASH_HEX SQL_EXEC_START SQL_EXEC_ID ---------- ------------- ------------ ---------- --------------- ---------- ------------------- ----------- 3403546624 as3g00v5dw000 0 0 2236899148 cade0000 2025-02-04 14:49:53 16777216 --//session 2: SYS@book> @opeek 0x6cfa13f0 48 0 [06CFA13F0, 06CFA1420) = 611AFD80 00000000 611AFD80 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000014 00000000 00000000 00000000 611B9E10 00000000 SYS@book> @ sharepool/shp4z as3g00v5dw000 -1 SYS@book> @ pr ============================== HANDLE_TYPE : parent handle address KGLHDADR : 00000000611AFD80 KGLHDPAR : 00000000611AFD80 C40 : select /*+ 9 */ count(*) from dept where KGLHDLMD : 1 KGLHDPMD : 0 KGLHDIVC : 0 KGLOBHD0 : 00000000610A1760 KGLOBHD6 : 00 KGLOBHS0 : 4064 KGLOBHS6 : 0 KGLOBT16 : 0 N0_6_16 : 4064 N20 : 4064 KGLNAHSH : 3403546624 KGLOBT03 : as3g00v5dw000 KGLOBT09 : 65535 PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. --//父游标句柄地址00000000611AFD80已经写入mutex地址-0x10处。 SYS@book> @opeek 0x6cfa13f0 48 0 [06CFA13F0, 06CFA1420) = 611AFD80 00000000 611AFD80 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000018 00000000 00000000 00000000 611B9E10 00000000 --//可以发现实际上执行shp4z.sql脚本2次,导致gets增加4次,有时候又没有不确定.. 4.继续测试: --//由于目前版本21c不支持oradebug poke内存信息,采用gdb操作。 --//session 3: SYS@book> @ spid ============================== SID : 263 SERIAL# : 53123 PROCESS : 3404 SERVER : DEDICATED SPID : 3405 PID : 86 P_SERIAL# : 2 KILL_COMMAND : alter system kill session '263,53123' immediate; PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. --//window 1: $ rlgdb -f -p 3405 ... (gdb) x /8wx 0x6cfa1400 0x6cfa1400: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000018 0x00000000 0x6cfa1410: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x611b9e10 0x00000000 --//当前gets=0x18. (gdb) set *(int *)0x6cfa1404=0x7777 --//注意intel CPU的字节顺序,修改地址是0x6cfa1404。 (gdb) x /8wx 0x6cfa1400 0x6cfa1400: 0x00000000 0x00007777 0x00000018 0x00000000 0x6cfa1410: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x611b9e10 0x00000000 --//windows 2,跟踪session 1进程: $ strace -Ttt -y -f -p 3399 2>&1 | tee mutex0204.txt --//session 1: SCOTT@book01p> select /*+ 9 */ count(*) from dept where deptno = 93834; --//挂起,等3X秒。 --//window 1: (gdb) set *(int *)0x6cfa1404=0x0 SYS@book> @opeek 0x6cfa13f0 48 0 [06CFA13F0, 06CFA1420) = 611AFD80 00000000 611AFD80 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000019 000009A2 00000000 00000000 611B9E10 00000000 --//对比前面的gets从0x18->0x19. 增加1次,sleeps次数从0x0->0x9a2 = 2466,增加2466次。 --//session 1: SCOTT@book01p> select /*+ 9 */ count(*) from dept where deptno = 93834; COUNT(*) ---------- 0 --//执行完成。 5.分析: --//session 2: SYS@book> @ ashtop event,p1,p1raw,p2raw,p3raw 1=1 &5min Total Distinct Distinct Distinct Seconds AAS %This EVENT P1 P1RAW P2RAW P3RAW FIRST_SEEN LAST_SEEN Execs Seen Tstamps Execs Seen1 --------- ------- ------- ----------------------------- ----- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------- -------- ----------- 67 .2 42% | 3 2025-02-04 14:58:00 2025-02-04 15:02:34 1 67 67 48 .2 30% | library cache: bucket mutex X 0 0000000000000000 0000777700000000 000000000000003E 2025-02-04 14:59:32 2025-02-04 15:00:19 1 48 48 13 .0 8% | 20 2025-02-04 14:57:47 2025-02-04 15:01:22 1 13 13 11 .0 7% | 100 2025-02-04 14:57:43 2025-02-04 15:02:11 1 11 11 5 .0 3% | LGWR all worker groups 0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 2025-02-04 14:59:37 2025-02-04 15:00:26 1 5 5 4 .0 3% | 300 2025-02-04 14:58:50 2025-02-04 14:59:15 1 4 4 3 .0 2% | 0 2025-02-04 14:59:39 2025-02-04 15:00:24 1 3 3 2 .0 1% | control file parallel write 2 0000000000000002 0000000000000003 0000000000000002 2025-02-04 15:02:30 2025-02-04 15:02:36 1 2 2 1 .0 1% | direct path read 1 0000000000000001 000000000000B880 0000000000000040 2025-02-04 15:02:32 2025-02-04 15:02:32 1 1 1 1 .0 1% | log file parallel write 1 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 0000000000000001 2025-02-04 14:59:09 2025-02-04 14:59:09 1 1 1 1 .0 1% | log file parallel write 1 0000000000000001 000000000000000F 0000000000000001 2025-02-04 14:59:37 2025-02-04 14:59:37 1 1 1 1 .0 1% | 63 2025-02-04 14:59:05 2025-02-04 14:59:05 1 1 1 1 .0 1% | 84 2025-02-04 15:02:23 2025-02-04 15:02:23 1 1 1 1 .0 1% | 291 2025-02-04 14:59:24 2025-02-04 14:59:24 1 1 1 1 .0 1% | 65536 2025-02-04 15:00:54 2025-02-04 15:00:54 1 1 1 15 rows selected. --//P2RAW=0000777700000000. SYS@book> @ ev_namezpr "library cache: bucket mutex X" ============================== EVENT# : 379 EVENT_ID : 2601513493 NAME : library cache: bucket mutex X PARAMETER1 : idn PARAMETER2 : value PARAMETER3 : where WAIT_CLASS_ID : 3875070507 WAIT_CLASS# : 4 WAIT_CLASS : Concurrency DISPLAY_NAME : library cache: bucket mutex X CON_ID : 0 PL/SQL procedure successfully completed. --//p1 hash=0等于bucket桶号,P2 对应mutex值,注意intel cpu的字节顺序问题,00007777在前面。p2 0x3e = 62 --//window 2: --//按ctrl+c中断strace跟踪。 $ egrep "sched_yield|getrusage" mutex0204.txt 14:59:31.787265 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 332819}, ru_stime={0, 27126}, ...}) = 0 <0.000063> 14:59:31.787491 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 332902}, ru_stime={0, 27133}, ...}) = 0 <0.000015> 14:59:31.787549 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 332911}, ru_stime={0, 27133}, ...}) = 0 <0.000013> 14:59:31.787671 sched_yield() = 0 <0.000227> 14:59:31.788037 sched_yield() = 0 <0.000062> 14:59:33.279533 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 333892}, ru_stime={0, 31204}, ...}) = 0 <0.000035> 14:59:35.291641 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 339971}, ru_stime={0, 32628}, ...}) = 0 <0.000179> 14:59:37.291983 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 344284}, ru_stime={0, 36240}, ...}) = 0 <0.000077> 14:59:39.285997 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 347436}, ru_stime={0, 38249}, ...}) = 0 <0.000076> 14:59:41.301019 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 350147}, ru_stime={0, 40320}, ...}) = 0 <0.000015> 14:59:43.312911 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 353924}, ru_stime={0, 45159}, ...}) = 0 <0.000015> 14:59:45.307157 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 360457}, ru_stime={0, 46785}, ...}) = 0 <0.000031> 14:59:47.310026 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 365011}, ru_stime={0, 49095}, ...}) = 0 <0.000033> 14:59:49.335822 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 367872}, ru_stime={0, 52553}, ...}) = 0 <0.000029> 14:59:51.329267 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 372229}, ru_stime={0, 53946}, ...}) = 0 <0.000028> 14:59:53.331265 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 374290}, ru_stime={0, 57499}, ...}) = 0 <0.000037> 14:59:55.336138 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 376766}, ru_stime={0, 59718}, ...}) = 0 <0.000081> 14:59:57.343453 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 378673}, ru_stime={0, 62024}, ...}) = 0 <0.000028> 14:59:59.340053 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 379916}, ru_stime={0, 63137}, ...}) = 0 <0.000028> 15:00:01.344914 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 384742}, ru_stime={0, 64305}, ...}) = 0 <0.000015> 15:00:03.361060 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 386351}, ru_stime={0, 68952}, ...}) = 0 <0.000044> 15:00:05.369793 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 388195}, ru_stime={0, 73472}, ...}) = 0 <0.000028> 15:00:07.365355 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 388906}, ru_stime={0, 79941}, ...}) = 0 <0.000062> 15:00:09.366864 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 391246}, ru_stime={0, 82596}, ...}) = 0 <0.000026> 15:00:11.368288 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 393473}, ru_stime={0, 86106}, ...}) = 0 <0.000251> 15:00:13.381993 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 394210}, ru_stime={0, 90971}, ...}) = 0 <0.000040> 15:00:15.390105 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 401516}, ru_stime={0, 92994}, ...}) = 0 <0.000028> 15:00:17.390237 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 403435}, ru_stime={0, 96736}, ...}) = 0 <0.000028> 15:00:19.390711 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 403794}, ru_stime={0, 99023}, ...}) = 0 <0.000232> 15:00:20.383125 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 404769}, ru_stime={0, 100092}, ...}) = 0 <0.000026> 15:00:20.384382 getrusage(0x1 /* RUSAGE_??? */, {ru_utime={0, 404975}, ru_stime={0, 100143}, ...}) = 0 <0.000016> --//注意看时间间隔,开始sched_yield执行2次之后2秒调用1次getrusage。 $ awk '{print $2}' mutex0204.txt |egrep "semtimedop|getrusage|sched_yield|select" | uniq -c|head 3 getrusage(0x1 2 sched_yield() 83 semtimedop(98304, 1 getrusage(0x1 115 semtimedop(98304, 1 getrusage(0x1 123 semtimedop(98304, 1 getrusage(0x1 86 semtimedop(98304, 1 getrusage(0x1 --//可以看出规律,开始2次sched_yield,接着调用semtimedop许多次(每次0.01秒),2秒之后调用1次getrusage,如此重复。 $ grep "semtimedop" mutex0204.txt | head -4 14:59:31.788149 semtimedop(98304, {{46, -1, 0}}, 1, {0, 10000000}) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) <0.020113> 14:59:31.808359 semtimedop(98304, {{46, -1, 0}}, 1, {0, 10000000}) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) <0.009714> 14:59:31.818220 semtimedop(98304, {{46, -1, 0}}, 1, {0, 10000000}) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) <0.010634> 14:59:31.828961 semtimedop(98304, {{46, -1, 0}}, 1, {0, 10000000}) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) <0.017562> $ grep semtimedop mutex0204.txt | awk '{print $8}'| uniq -c 2464 10000000}) --//调用semtimedop 2464次,加上2次sched_yield(),sleeps合计2466次,与opeek看到的结果0x000009A2=2466一致。 --//{0, 10000000} 前面参数的时间单位是秒,后面参数的时间单位是纳秒。10000000/10^9 = .01,相当于10毫秒,与后面的执行时间一 --//致。感觉虚拟机器有点不稳定,以前我在11g下测试基本都是18X次。 SYS@book> @ mutexprofz id,loc "ts>=trunc(sysdate)+14/24+59/1440+30/86400" -- MutexProf by Tanel Poder (http://www.tanelpoder.com) -- Showing profile of top 20 sleeps... -- column info : id idn hash hash_value=>hash_value ts=>sleep_timestamp -- req=>requesting_session blk=>blocking_session val=>mutex_value maddr=>mutex_addr SUM_SLEEPS GETS_DIFF MUTEX_TYPE ID GET_LOCATION OBJECT_NAME ---------- --------- --------------- ---------- ------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2466 Library Cache 0 kglhdgn1 62 (name not found) 3 Cursor Parent 2276283790 kksLoadChild [KKSPRTLOC4] SELECT /*+ NO_STATEMENT_QUEUING RESULT_CACHE (SYSOBJ=TRUE) */ "OBJ#","CLASS_OID","JOB_FLAGS","RUN_TIME","PRIORITY","JOB_STATUS","RUNNING_INSTA NCE","SCHEDULE_LIMIT","JOB_WEIGHT","INSTANCE_ID","AFFINITY","DATABASE_ROLE" FROM "SYS"."SCHEDULER$_JOB_REFRESH" "SCHEDULER$_JOB_REFRESH" WHERE 1=1 1 Library Cache 2276283790 kglhdgn2 106 SELECT /*+ NO_STATEMENT_QUEUING RESULT_CACHE (SYSOBJ=TRUE) */ "OBJ#","CLASS_OID","JOB_FLAGS","RUN_TIME","PRIORITY","JOB_STATUS","RUNNING_INSTA NCE","SCHEDULE_LIMIT","JOB_WEIGHT","INSTANCE_ID","AFFINITY","DATABASE_ROLE" FROM "SYS"."SCHEDULER$_JOB_REFRESH" "SCHEDULER$_JOB_REFRESH" WHERE 1=1 --//记录的sleeps次数也是2466次。GET_LOCATION 对应的数字62 与前面ashtop 看到的p2 0x3e对应,注意id=0表示bucket桶号。 $ ./lookup.awk kglhdgn1 (kglhdgn)1 : kernel generic library cache management object handle get handle, if it doesn't exist, create it ?? 4.小结: --//缺省_mutex_wait_time=1,_mutex_wait_scheme=2的情况下semtimedop的时间是10毫秒。 --//_mutex_wait_scheme=2模式下开始sched_yield 2次,接着调用semtimedop许多次(每次0.01秒),2秒之后调用1次getrusage,如此重复。 --//这次测试_mutex_wait_time=1的情况,单位厘秒.调用semtimedop每次0.01秒,当大于1时sleeps的时间会出现指数回退,另外写一篇 --//验证这样的情况.另外有机会测试_mutex_wait_scheme=0,1的情况。 --//另外关于_mutex_spin_count缺省255,按照前面理解,在yielding/waiting之前应该存在255次spin,不知道理解是否正确,如何验 --//证不是很清楚. * _mutex_spin_count (Integer) - This sets the number of times to spin before yielding/waiting. --//我做了如下尝试,从时间上看不出来。但是可以通过top -p spid发现CPU使用增加。 SYS@book> alter system set "_mutex_spin_count"=65535 scope=memory; System altered.
[20250204]21c library cache mutex的深入探究7(_mutex_wait_scheme=2).txt
来源:这里教程网
时间:2026-03-03 21:33:19
作者:
编辑推荐:
- [20250204]21c library cache mutex的深入探究7(_mutex_wait_scheme=2).txt03-03
- [20250204]21c library cache mutex的深入探究8(_mutex_wait_time>1)03-03
- [20250205]21c library cache mutex的深入探究9(_mutex_wait_scheme=0).txt03-03
- [20250205]21c library cache mutex的深入探究10(_mutex_wait_scheme=1).txt03-03
- [20250206]21c library cache mutex的小结.txt03-03
- [20250206]21c library cache mutex的深入探究使用的sql脚本.txt03-03
- [20250210]21c library cache mutex的深入探究12(补充).txt03-03
- hyper xp,hyper xp的实操攻略,hyper-v批量管理工具的使用指南03-03
下一篇:
相关推荐
-
雷神推出 MIX PRO II 迷你主机:基于 Ultra 200H,玻璃上盖 + ARGB 灯效
2 月 9 日消息,雷神 (THUNDEROBOT) 现已宣布推出基于英
-
制造商 Musnap 推出彩色墨水屏电纸书 Ocean C:支持手写笔、第三方安卓应用
2 月 10 日消息,制造商 Musnap 现已在海外推出一款 Oce
热文推荐
- hyper xp,hyper xp的实操攻略,hyper-v批量管理工具的使用指南
- hyper 共享,hyper 共享的实操流程,hyper-v批量管理工具的使用指南
- hyper v win10,hyper v win10的实操流程,hyper-v批量管理工具的使用指南
- hyper v vmware,hyper v vmware的实操流程,hyper-v批量管理工具的使用指南
- 数据库io负载瓶颈问题
数据库io负载瓶颈问题
26-03-03 - log file sync导致的Oracle重大生产性能故障
log file sync导致的Oracle重大生产性能故障
26-03-03 - 蛇年第一个Oracle 600错误!15年老司机也没见过
蛇年第一个Oracle 600错误!15年老司机也没见过
26-03-03 - oracle多次密码错误登录,用户锁住或失效
oracle多次密码错误登录,用户锁住或失效
26-03-03 - 第28期 Oracle LOB数据实际存储在哪里
第28期 Oracle LOB数据实际存储在哪里
26-03-03 - 关闭hyper-v,关闭hyper-v的实操步骤,hyper-v批量管理工具的使用指南
